Socialism would never have entered the world if its proponents had sought only to excite the enthusiasm of the working classes for a better order of things. What made for the power and authority of the movement was that Marx understood how to interest the workers in a social order which would both benefit them and appear to them as just. It is exactly the same with art. At no point in time, no matter how utopian, will anyone win the masses over to a higher art; they can be won over only to one nearer to them. And the difficulty consists precisely in finding a form for art such that, with the best conscience in the world, one could hold that it is a higher art. This will never happen with most of what is propagated by the avant-garde of the bourgeoisie.
- Is it just me that thinks if someone can’t look after a building, especially ones that are of heritage and geograph… twitter.com/i/web/status/1… 1 week ago
- RT @artnotarms: We've just found out the National Festival of Making which offers "engaging arts and cultural activities for families & com… 3 weeks ago
- RT @StudioImagoTW: GAS Contemporary will be opening a new art gallery in North Shields this coming weekend at Studio Imago's Artist Studio… 1 month ago
- Speaking this afternoon @CHWAlliance at @GNM_Hancock @TWAMmuseums about working class cultural identities and museu… twitter.com/i/web/status/1… 1 month ago
- With my last tweet in mind about @ACAAllenheads Continuum project about space, some graffiti 3 minutes walk from… twitter.com/i/web/status/1… 3 months ago